Lefora Free Forum
113 views

Opinion Essay : More powerful countries should have more right to use military force to influence world events.

Page 1
posts 1–9 of 9
regular - member
91 posts

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.

"More powerful countries should have more right to use military force to influence world events."

 Support your opinion with reasons and examples.

regular - member
91 posts

This is Junho's topic. If you want to read this opinion essay, please find the other same topic essay.

regular - member
76 posts

Quarrel is one of the origin natures of human. And many wars were occurred through long history of human. Although human call themselves as ‘Homo Sapiens Sapiens’, the wise creature and they become more and more wiser, they are still quite cruel creature. Still, each year, many wars are occurred through whole world. Then why those wars are occurred? In my opinion, in most case, war is occurred when one country is weaker than another country. Because they want to take something from weaker country and that weaker country doesn’t have a power to protect what they have. So now, we have an answer to prevent the war. There must be a power to restrain that horrible war.

Do you think the ‘Iraq war’ of 2003 is a war? No. It was just an attack of US to Iraq. The ‘Georgia war’ of 2008 was the same case. Both of the cases, there is a quite strong country. And the country that is attacked by stronger country is much weaker. They don’t have a power to protect themselves. Surely, there was an organization that has a power to use their force to restrain the war. Such as UN army to maintain the peace. The problem was, UN’s most powerful country was that which out broke the war. As a result, UN didn’t send its army to the place where war was broken. So what I mean is that there is no exact meaning of force to restrain the war these days. And this can be the greatest reason of war.

But intervene in a dispute by a certain country must be prevented. As you no war is quite expensive task. It also risks many things. Such as opposition of the people, have a bad name by other nations. Then why the wars are occurred. Needless to say, there is a thing that can be gained through the war. In other words, the country which intervene the war can make the war bigger and worse. For example, British intervened the ‘Iraq war’. Its government said they just want to eradicate the terrorist force and protect the world’s peace. But how was the result. More armies were committed to the war and more people were die. Not only armed persons, but also people that have no connection with the war were killed by the war.

In conclusion, there must be a force to prevent the war. But that must not be belonged to certain nation. UN is not enough. It is too old and doesn’t have enough power to influence the war. And UN can be controlled by powerful nations when using its power. So I think make a new organization that is not controlled by any nations. It will be composed by the armies that are sent from nations all over the world. This characteristic as united army will give fairness to that organization to intervene the war.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although I did my best, I couldn't write any better. I think it was too, too hard topic for me to write..

Sorry llorz

regular - member
91 posts

Hi, Junho.

In fact, I mistakenly give you a wrong topic. In spite of it, you wrote your essay based on the right topic,

" When two countries go to war, there should be no support or interference from other countries."

 

Junho, after I read your essay, I could know you worked hard about this topic. I think your ideas are good, and you explained pretty well. In fact, most recent big wars can be called 'attack' of more powerful countries as you gave Iraq War and Georgia War for examples. Unfortunately, UN peace forces do not always seem fair to every countries. So, the idea of making a new organization to intervene war is pursuasive.

All the things in your essay are good, but if I give you a advice,

Firstly, you can give a few more examples of actual wars, or it would be better to explain how the wars were getting bigger and worse by engagement of other countries. I think more examples or logical explaints make an essay more convincing.

Thank you for you considerate work.

 

regular - member
87 posts


Quarrel is one of the origin natures of human. And many wars were occurred through long history of human. Although human call themselves as ‘Homo Sapiens Sapiens’, the wise creature and they become more and more wiser, they are still quite cruel creature. Still, each year, many wars are occurred through whole world. Then why those wars are occurred? In my opinion, in most case, war is occurred when one country is weaker than another country. Because they want to take something from weaker country and that weaker country doesn’t have a power to protect what they have. So now, we have an answer to prevent the war. There must be a power to restrain that horrible war.

Do you think the ‘Iraq war’ of 2003 is a war? No. It was just an attack of US to Iraq. The ‘Georgia war’ of 2008 was the same case. Both of the cases, there is a quite strong country. And the country that is attacked by stronger country is much weaker. They don’t have a power to protect themselves. Surely, there was an organization that has a power to use their force to restrain the war. Such as UN army to maintain the peace. The problem was, UN’s most powerful country was that which out broke the war. As a result, UN didn’t send its army to the place where war was broken. So what I mean is that there is no exact meaning of force to restrain the war these days. And this can be the greatest reason of war.

But intervene in a dispute by a certain country must be prevented. As you no war is quite expensive task. It also risks many things. Such as opposition of the people, have a bad name by other nations. Then why the wars are occurred. Needless to say, there is a thing that can be gained through the war. In other words, the country which intervene the war can make the war bigger and worse. For example, British intervened the ‘Iraq war’. Its government said they just want to eradicate the terrorist force and protect the world’s peace. But how was the result. More armies were committed to the war and more people were die. Not only armed persons, but also people that have no connection with the war were killed by the war.

In conclusion, there must be a force to prevent the war. But that must not be belonged to certain nation. UN is not enough. It is too old and doesn’t have enough power to influence the war. And UN can be controlled by powerful nations when using its power. So I think make a new organization that is not controlled by any nations. It will be composed by the armies that are sent from nations all over the world. This characteristic as united army will give fairness to that organization to intervene the war.------------------------------------------------------------------------------Although I did my best, I couldn't write any better. I think it was too, too hard topic for me to write..

Sorry llorz

-junholee

 Hi, Junho

It might be first time to read your essay. By reading your essay, I'm quite impressed by your view of Iraq war. As you no war is quite expensive task. (- I can't understand what is the meaning of this sentence. So there must be some corrections for it. However, I enjoyed your essay and it was good opportunity to get much information about global society and war.

Good Luck !

 

regular - member
82 posts

Hello, Junho!! Long time no see.
I saw you in the forum now! I think you also are struggling with writing comments. Good luck.><

Yes, I agree with your opinion. The powerful countries do not have a right to use military forces just because they are more power than others. Iraq war...
Yeah!! As you mentioned in your essay, it was not a 'war', it was USA's affection. Bushi can not be forgiven with excuse that he wanted to protect the word. However, think about Korean war... Can you imagine that Korea couldn't get any help from USA force? I think, this is the dillema.

Anyway, thanks Junho!!


Quarrel is one of the origin natures of human. And many wars were occurred through long history of human. Although human call themselves as ‘Homo Sapiens Sapiens’, the wise creature and they become more and more wiser, they are still quite cruel creature. Still, each year, many wars are occurred through whole world. Then why those wars are occurred? In my opinion, in most case, war is occurred when one country is weaker than another country. Because they want to take something from weaker country and that weaker country doesn’t have a power to protect what they have. So now, we have an answer to prevent the war. There must be a power to restrain that horrible war.

Do you think the ‘Iraq war’ of 2003 is a war? No. It was just an attack of US to Iraq. The ‘Georgia war’ of 2008 was the same case. Both of the cases, there is a quite strong country. And the country that is attacked by stronger country is much weaker. They don’t have a power to protect themselves. Surely, there was an organization that has a power to use their force to restrain the war. Such as UN army to maintain the peace. The problem was, UN’s most powerful country was that which out broke the war. As a result, UN didn’t send its army to the place where war was broken. So what I mean is that there is no exact meaning of force to restrain the war these days. And this can be the greatest reason of war.

But intervene in a dispute by a certain country must be prevented. As you no war is quite expensive task. It also risks many things. Such as opposition of the people, have a bad name by other nations. Then why the wars are occurred. Needless to say, there is a thing that can be gained through the war. In other words, the country which intervene the war can make the war bigger and worse. For example, British intervened the ‘Iraq war’. Its government said they just want to eradicate the terrorist force and protect the world’s peace. But how was the result. More armies were committed to the war and more people were die. Not only armed persons, but also people that have no connection with the war were killed by the war.

In conclusion, there must be a force to prevent the war. But that must not be belonged to certain nation. UN is not enough. It is too old and doesn’t have enough power to influence the war. And UN can be controlled by powerful nations when using its power. So I think make a new organization that is not controlled by any nations. It will be composed by the armies that are sent from nations all over the world. This characteristic as united army will give fairness to that organization to intervene the war.------------------------------------------------------------------------------Although I did my best, I couldn't write any better. I think it was too, too hard topic for me to write..

Sorry llorz

-junholee

regular - member
91 posts

Hello.
I really enjoyed your essay. It is very reasonable and meaningful opinion.

We have to prevent war as you said, and it is necessary to exist the organization you uttered. All the people across the world have to put together. But, if some nation had power overwhelming others, it would use its power in a way profitable to itself, though it had been a nation who had advocated peace. War may perhaps not be under the control of people.

regular - member
113 posts

Hi Junho, long time no see. Do you enjoy your winter vacation? :D
I read your essay with careful attention. I was very impressed with your profound knowledge about war and its behind story. I agree with your idea. I do not think there exists a mediator who can stop the war and arbitrate both countries. I especially agree with your second point that all countries just care about their own profits, not for other countries'

In addition, Hyunjin, I think Junho intended to say "As you know, war is quite expensive task.", which means it cost a lot of money. Maybe he didn't notice that erased "ow" when he typed this essay ;b

regular - member
84 posts

Hi, junho.
I think you essay is quite knowledgeable. You wrote many historic events that happened long time ago I don’t even remember. So when readers like me read your essay, they would be overwhelmed by your writing and then become to agree with your idea. But, I think your essay is not that convincing. I cannot see what is your opinion and ideas. Maybe you misunderstood the topic. If you understood the topic well and wrote the essay, it would be much greater essay, I bet.
Thank you.


Quarrel is one of the origin natures of human. And many wars were occurred through long history of human. Although human call themselves as ‘Homo Sapiens Sapiens’, the wise creature and they become more and more wiser, they are still quite cruel creature. Still, each year, many wars are occurred through whole world. Then why those wars are occurred? In my opinion, in most case, war is occurred when one country is weaker than another country. Because they want to take something from weaker country and that weaker country doesn’t have a power to protect what they have. So now, we have an answer to prevent the war. There must be a power to restrain that horrible war.

Do you think the ‘Iraq war’ of 2003 is a war? No. It was just an attack of US to Iraq. The ‘Georgia war’ of 2008 was the same case. Both of the cases, there is a quite strong country. And the country that is attacked by stronger country is much weaker. They don’t have a power to protect themselves. Surely, there was an organization that has a power to use their force to restrain the war. Such as UN army to maintain the peace. The problem was, UN’s most powerful country was that which out broke the war. As a result, UN didn’t send its army to the place where war was broken. So what I mean is that there is no exact meaning of force to restrain the war these days. And this can be the greatest reason of war.

But intervene in a dispute by a certain country must be prevented. As you no war is quite expensive task. It also risks many things. Such as opposition of the people, have a bad name by other nations. Then why the wars are occurred. Needless to say, there is a thing that can be gained through the war. In other words, the country which intervene the war can make the war bigger and worse. For example, British intervened the ‘Iraq war’. Its government said they just want to eradicate the terrorist force and protect the world’s peace. But how was the result. More armies were committed to the war and more people were die. Not only armed persons, but also people that have no connection with the war were killed by the war.

In conclusion, there must be a force to prevent the war. But that must not be belonged to certain nation. UN is not enough. It is too old and doesn’t have enough power to influence the war. And UN can be controlled by powerful nations when using its power. So I think make a new organization that is not controlled by any nations. It will be composed by the armies that are sent from nations all over the world. This characteristic as united army will give fairness to that organization to intervene the war.------------------------------------------------------------------------------Although I did my best, I couldn't write any better. I think it was too, too hard topic for me to write..

Sorry llorz

-junholee

__________________
No pain, no gain.
Page 1
posts 1–9 of 9

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now