Lefora Free Forum
66 views

Opinion Essay : The six-party countries should establish multilateral relations with North Korea.

Page 1
posts 1–7 of 7
regular - member
103 posts

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
"The six-party countries should establish multilateral relations with North Korea."
Present reasons and examples to support your opinion.

└Hey, Seung-ug, I'm sorry for a troublesome topic. But, I'm sure that you will really make it out!

regular - member
84 posts

North Korea is one of the hot issues in this world. They constantly try to catch the attention of the world to protect their own political system and economic benefits. Sometimes their behaviors provoke problems because they threaten other countries for themselves. Recently they were trying to make nuclear weapons. Countries wanted to make them stop because if they had nuclear weapons, the world’s safety could be in big trouble. It can lead to terror or war. So the six-party talks is planned to be held. The six-party talks is the name of conference involving North Korea and related five countries; South Korea, The United States, Russia, Japan and China. I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. That’s because of these three reasons; each country’s political and economic situations are different; five countries can build up collective responsibility; it can be model of solving global problems in the future.

First of all, the reason why I agree with the idea is that each country’s political and economic situations are different. If they talk separately with North Korea, they can’t know each other’s standpoint and opinions so that North Korea would take the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Then there would be no way to solve the problems. North Korea would want more and give less. They know what other five countries’ weak points are so they can claim what they want from each country. But through the six-party talks, five countries can put together their strong points and defend weak points. It’s like one big nation. So the leadership would be no longer taken by North Korea. It is very important matter which side has the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Countries can make North Korea give up nuclear weapons with minimum cost by the six-party talks.

Second reason is that five countries can build up collective responsibility. The purpose of North Korea’s action is confusing and separating other countries’ connection so they can take high position in negotiation, like I mentioned above. If each country talks with North Korea separately, there would be no country responsible because they don’t know how each other’s negotiation with North Korea progressed. North Korea doesn’t have to fulfill their entire obligation with other five countries because they are not restricted by international law actually, like in recent case. So after conferences, we can’t know which countries are responsible for the result. Then there would be conflicts between five countries. North Korea takes what they want, but other five countries do not because they did not discuss before negotiations.

Last but not least, it can be model of solving global problems in the future. The six-party is countries that one nation which provoked global problems and five countries that are related to the problems. It is very efficient organization to solve the problems because decisions can be made quickly and reflect each country’s interests as much as possible. The Korean Peninsula is very important area in political, economical and also military aspects so it is reasonable that there are so many problems happening in this region. There are also many areas like the Korean Peninsula, which also many problems are occurring. Organization like the six-party can be a good model to solve those problems. By establishing multi-lateral relations, countries that are related to problems can all have benefits.

North Korea’s nuclear problem is not yet solved. It is a real situation full of dynamite. If one thing goes wrong, it can lead to such a disaster. But we have great solution, which can give every country satisfaction. All we have to do is just have some patience and wait. There is no better way to solve the problem than every country sit together and talk their standpoints. They can mediate each other’s interests and all have satisfactory results. So I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea.

__________________
No pain, no gain.
regular - member
103 posts

Hello, Seung-ug!
First, I'm really sorry about a tangled topic.ㅠ-ㅠ
I know how hard it was. And you said, "I have to look up some vocabularies, especially about political!".
However I knew that you could work it out!!!! And I hope it was helpful to you. Also I really looked forward to your essay.

But,, I think there is a still remaining doubt that "should only N.K break their nuclear weapon? How about other countries which have nuclear weapons? Aren't there any threaten to world-peace?"
Frankly speaking, I don't know and I guess neither do others. I think this doubt would not be solved and it should wait for more than a century. Maybe making decision or evaluating it is a sort of responsibility of our offspirngs. How about your idea?

Anyway here's my feedback.
Your intro had a power to make me concentrate on it.
Among your three reasons, I like your third reason most. Yeah, one good idea or thing could be helpful and a model to other things. The Six-party Talk could be a role model to other nations which have headache in inter-relations.
And at your conclusion, what a good metaphor that "full of dynamite"! Also your conclusion was well constructed. You effectively summed up it and also made well the last sentence with appealing your main idea again. :-⊃


North Korea is one of the hot issues in this world. They constantly try to catch the attention of the world to protect their own political system and economic benefits. Sometimes their behaviors provoke problems because they threaten other countries for themselves. Recently they were trying to make nuclear weapons. Countries wanted to make them stop because if they had nuclear weapons, the world’s safety could be in big trouble. It can lead to terror or war. So the six-party talks is planned to be held. The six-party talks is the name of conference involving North Korea and related five countries; South Korea, The United States, Russia, Japan and China. I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. That’s because of these three reasons; each country’s political and economic situations are different; five countries can build up collective responsibility; it can be model of solving global problems in the future.

First of all, the reason why I agree with the idea is that each country’s political and economic situations are different. If they talk separately with North Korea, they can’t know each other’s standpoint and opinions so that North Korea would take the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Then there would be no way to solve the problems. North Korea would want more and give less. They know what other five countries’ weak points are so they can claim what they want from each country. But through the six-party talks, five countries can put together their strong points and defend weak points. It’s like one big nation. So the leadership would be no longer taken by North Korea. It is very important matter which side has the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Countries can make North Korea give up nuclear weapons with minimum cost by the six-party talks.

Second reason is that five countries can build up collective responsibility. The purpose of North Korea’s action is confusing and separating other countries’ connection so they can take high position in negotiation, like I mentioned above. If each country talks with North Korea separately, there would be no country responsible because they don’t know how each other’s negotiation with North Korea progressed. North Korea doesn’t have to fulfill their entire obligation with other five countries because they are not restricted by international law actually, like in recent case. So after conferences, we can’t know which countries are responsible for the result. Then there would be conflicts between five countries. North Korea takes what they want, but other five countries do not because they did not discuss before negotiations.

Last but not least, it can be model of solving global problems in the future. The six-party is countries that one nation which provoked global problems and five countries that are related to the problems. It is very efficient organization to solve the problems because decisions can be made quickly and reflect each country’s interests as much as possible. The Korean Peninsula is very important area in political, economical and also military aspects so it is reasonable that there are so many problems happening in this region. There are also many areas like the Korean Peninsula, which also many problems are occurring. Organization like the six-party can be a good model to solve those problems. By establishing multi-lateral relations, countries that are related to problems can all have benefits.

North Korea’s nuclear problem is not yet solved. It is a real situation full of dynamite. If one thing goes wrong, it can lead to such a disaster. But we have great solution, which can give every country satisfaction. All we have to do is just have some patience and wait. There is no better way to solve the problem than every country sit together and talk their standpoints. They can mediate each other’s interests and all have satisfactory results. So I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea.

-seunguglee

regular - member
80 posts

I think this subject is the most hardest. But you did it well!!! The nuclear problem is not far from us. So your essay is really impressive. Most of all, these three reasons are reasonable. At first, I disagree with this subject. However, after reading this essay, I've changed my mind. Right, the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. Because nuclear weapon threatens the worlds, countries should work together for solving the problem.

regular - member
101 posts

North Korea is one of the hot issues in this world. They constantly try to catch the attention of the world to protect their own political system and economic benefits. Sometimes their behaviors provoke problems because they threaten other countries for themselves. Recently they were trying to make nuclear weapons. Countries wanted to make them stop because if they had nuclear weapons, the world’s safety could be in big trouble. It can lead to terror or war. So the six-party talks is planned to be held. The six-party talks is the name of conference involving North Korea and related five countries; South Korea, The United States, Russia, Japan and China. I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. That’s because of these three reasons; each country’s political and economic situations are different; five countries can build up collective responsibility; it can be model of solving global problems in the future.

First of all, the reason why I agree with the idea is that each country’s political and economic situations are different. If they talk separately with North Korea, they can’t know each other’s standpoint and opinions so that North Korea would take the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Then there would be no way to solve the problems. North Korea would want more and give less. They know what other five countries’ weak points are so they can claim what they want from each country. But through the six-party talks, five countries can put together their strong points and defend weak points. It’s like one big nation. So the leadership would be no longer taken by North Korea. It is very important matter which side has the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Countries can make North Korea give up nuclear weapons with minimum cost by the six-party talks.

Second reason is that five countries can build up collective responsibility. The purpose of North Korea’s action is confusing and separating other countries’ connection so they can take high position in negotiation, like I mentioned above. If each country talks with North Korea separately, there would be no country responsible because they don’t know how each other’s negotiation with North Korea progressed. North Korea doesn’t have to fulfill their entire obligation with other five countries because they are not restricted by international law actually, like in recent case. So after conferences, we can’t know which countries are responsible for the result. Then there would be conflicts between five countries. North Korea takes what they want, but other five countries do not because they did not discuss before negotiations.

Last but not least, it can be model of solving global problems in the future. The six-party is countries that one nation which provoked global problems and five countries that are related to the problems. It is very efficient organization to solve the problems because decisions can be made quickly and reflect each country’s interests as much as possible. The Korean Peninsula is very important area in political, economical and also military aspects so it is reasonable that there are so many problems happening in this region. There are also many areas like the Korean Peninsula, which also many problems are occurring. Organization like the six-party can be a good model to solve those problems. By establishing multi-lateral relations, countries that are related to problems can all have benefits.

North Korea’s nuclear problem is not yet solved. It is a real situation full of dynamite. If one thing goes wrong, it can lead to such a disaster. But we have great solution, which can give every country satisfaction. All we have to do is just have some patience and wait. There is no better way to solve the problem than every country sit together and talk their standpoints. They can mediate each other’s interests and all have satisfactory results. So I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea.

-seunguglee


Hello!

I enjoyed your essey. It is a current issue surrounding Korea. So this subject attract me. Six-parties focuses on the nuclear weapon problem in North Korea. In my opinion, the environment surrounding North and South Korea can not be solved immediately, so it will take lots of time and patience. Nuclear weapon problem is the worldwide issue, so this is also sovled by cooperation.

Thank you for your good essey.
__________________
Wook!
regular - member
101 posts

Hi, seungug!

I read your essay with interest. I think your topic was not easy to write, but you made it!

I entirely agree with your opinions. It is still a critical issue that North Korea has nuclear weapons and doesn't want to give up easily their standpoint even though there has been the strong countries' threats. This problem is really scaring not only to the countries near North Korea like China, Japan and South Korea but also to the Whole world because all over the countries are anxious about the result of the nuclear weapons.
You are right. This is not that problem which could be solved easily by just one or two countries around them. There needs to be considerable effort to give out their voice and understand one another in more peaceful way.

Anyway, your three main points are really persuasive. Good!


North Korea is one of the hot issues in this world. They constantly try to catch the attention of the world to protect their own political system and economic benefits. Sometimes their behaviors provoke problems because they threaten other countries for themselves. Recently they were trying to make nuclear weapons. Countries wanted to make them stop because if they had nuclear weapons, the world’s safety could be in big trouble. It can lead to terror or war. So the six-party talks is planned to be held. The six-party talks is the name of conference involving North Korea and related five countries; South Korea, The United States, Russia, Japan and China. I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. That’s because of these three reasons; each country’s political and economic situations are different; five countries can build up collective responsibility; it can be model of solving global problems in the future.

First of all, the reason why I agree with the idea is that each country’s political and economic situations are different. If they talk separately with North Korea, they can’t know each other’s standpoint and opinions so that North Korea would take the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Then there would be no way to solve the problems. North Korea would want more and give less. They know what other five countries’ weak points are so they can claim what they want from each country. But through the six-party talks, five countries can put together their strong points and defend weak points. It’s like one big nation. So the leadership would be no longer taken by North Korea. It is very important matter which side has the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Countries can make North Korea give up nuclear weapons with minimum cost by the six-party talks.

Second reason is that five countries can build up collective responsibility. The purpose of North Korea’s action is confusing and separating other countries’ connection so they can take high position in negotiation, like I mentioned above. If each country talks with North Korea separately, there would be no country responsible because they don’t know how each other’s negotiation with North Korea progressed. North Korea doesn’t have to fulfill their entire obligation with other five countries because they are not restricted by international law actually, like in recent case. So after conferences, we can’t know which countries are responsible for the result. Then there would be conflicts between five countries. North Korea takes what they want, but other five countries do not because they did not discuss before negotiations.

Last but not least, it can be model of solving global problems in the future. The six-party is countries that one nation which provoked global problems and five countries that are related to the problems. It is very efficient organization to solve the problems because decisions can be made quickly and reflect each country’s interests as much as possible. The Korean Peninsula is very important area in political, economical and also military aspects so it is reasonable that there are so many problems happening in this region. There are also many areas like the Korean Peninsula, which also many problems are occurring. Organization like the six-party can be a good model to solve those problems. By establishing multi-lateral relations, countries that are related to problems can all have benefits.

North Korea’s nuclear problem is not yet solved. It is a real situation full of dynamite. If one thing goes wrong, it can lead to such a disaster. But we have great solution, which can give every country satisfaction. All we have to do is just have some patience and wait. There is no better way to solve the problem than every country sit together and talk their standpoints. They can mediate each other’s interests and all have satisfactory results. So I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea.

-seunguglee

regular - member
51 posts


North Korea is one of the hot issues in this world. They constantly try to catch the attention of the world to protect their own political system and economic benefits. Sometimes their behaviors provoke problems because they threaten other countries for themselves. Recently they were trying to make nuclear weapons. Countries wanted to make them stop because if they had nuclear weapons, the world’s safety could be in big trouble. It can lead to terror or war. So the six-party talks is planned to be held. The six-party talks is the name of conference involving North Korea and related five countries; South Korea, The United States, Russia, Japan and China. I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea. That’s because of these three reasons; each country’s political and economic situations are different; five countries can build up collective responsibility; it can be model of solving global problems in the future.

First of all, the reason why I agree with the idea is that each country’s political and economic situations are different. If they talk separately with North Korea, they can’t know each other’s standpoint and opinions so that North Korea would take the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Then there would be no way to solve the problems. North Korea would want more and give less. They know what other five countries’ weak points are so they can claim what they want from each country. But through the six-party talks, five countries can put together their strong points and defend weak points. It’s like one big nation. So the leadership would be no longer taken by North Korea. It is very important matter which side has the leadership in diplomatic negotiations. Countries can make North Korea give up nuclear weapons with minimum cost by the six-party talks.

Second reason is that five countries can build up collective responsibility. The purpose of North Korea’s action is confusing and separating other countries’ connection so they can take high position in negotiation, like I mentioned above. If each country talks with North Korea separately, there would be no country responsible because they don’t know how each other’s negotiation with North Korea progressed. North Korea doesn’t have to fulfill their entire obligation with other five countries because they are not restricted by international law actually, like in recent case. So after conferences, we can’t know which countries are responsible for the result. Then there would be conflicts between five countries. North Korea takes what they want, but other five countries do not because they did not discuss before negotiations.

Last but not least, it can be model of solving global problems in the future. The six-party is countries that one nation which provoked global problems and five countries that are related to the problems. It is very efficient organization to solve the problems because decisions can be made quickly and reflect each country’s interests as much as possible. The Korean Peninsula is very important area in political, economical and also military aspects so it is reasonable that there are so many problems happening in this region. There are also many areas like the Korean Peninsula, which also many problems are occurring. Organization like the six-party can be a good model to solve those problems. By establishing multi-lateral relations, countries that are related to problems can all have benefits.

North Korea’s nuclear problem is not yet solved. It is a real situation full of dynamite. If one thing goes wrong, it can lead to such a disaster. But we have great solution, which can give every country satisfaction. All we have to do is just have some patience and wait. There is no better way to solve the problem than every country sit together and talk their standpoints. They can mediate each other’s interests and all have satisfactory results. So I agree with the idea that the six-party countries should establish multi-lateral relations with North Korea.

-seunguglee

Hi! seungug!
I read your essay very well. Most of all, I suprise your wriitng skill. I can't find your grammar defect in your essay! But, I disagree with your opinion because North Korea should be related to South Korea. South Korea have to solve the problem by theirself. If we solve this problem with other country, they might demand a lot of things. We can't ignore their demand. Of course, It is also related to other country. But, According to unification of North and South Korea, we have to handle that by ourself. It's my opinion. Anyway, I read your essay very well.

__________________
I like teaching a male student.
Page 1
posts 1–7 of 7

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now