Seminar Report
By SINJI KIM
Date: May, 31st, 2008
Subject: Old and New English Education in Korea
Held by English education department in KNU
Administrations changed in Korea this year, 2008, the main pledges that the president-elect promised were related to improving country’s competitiveness, which is under the slogan of new English education policy. As part of efforts to encourage interest in current English Education issue from students and give information to teachers in training, a seminar named ‘Old and New English Education in Korea’ was prepared by students in English Education department.
The content of seminar consists of four big themes: current issues in Korean English education; new education policy of Lee administration; strength and weakness of new policy; and new examination to evaluate English ability and teacher’s attitude according to new policy. Although there are lots of topics that are quite relevant to English education, the most important thing that students need to be aware of are the current problems that directly show the blind spot of education and consequently suggest the desirable way to teacher-to-be. Problems on English education referred in the seminar show some general phenomena in Korea: lack of English lessons; teacher centered methodology; non-practical textbooks and tests.
First, American or British people who use English as a mother language are exposed to the language naturally. For those whose mother tongues are not English, it is hard to be in the same condition as native speakers of English. Nevertheless, it’s still important for learners to have enough exposure to English, if they want to be like the native speakers. According to research of Defense Language Institute, average American students who want to acquire Korean have to take Korean classes from 2400 hours to 2760 hours as they can speak intermediate Korean. Considering this research, the amount of time allocated for English classes is not enough for Korean students to become fluent in English. Of course, merely increasing the number of English classes would not solve the fundamental problems, but still it is one of the steps needed to be taken in order to help students gain English proficiency.
Secondly, if you visualize typical English classes in secondary school, you get the image of a teacher standing in front of the class room where there are thirty or forty students. This means they don’t have a chance to have face-to face lectures and cannot get immediate individual feedbacks from a teacher. It’s so-called ‘teacher centered methodology’. As mentioned above, teachers and students have limited time to learn English thoroughly. The vogue of studying abroad and learning English at early age has resulted in increase in English proficiency of Korean students, while most teachers are not able to deal with the rapid change in students’ expectation and ability. For instance, the rate of English teachers who are able to teach English in English is 49.8%. It’s quite obvious that there need to be changes in Korea’s English education system. .
Last but definitely not least, most of the teachers in public secondary schools plan their lessons mainly based on textbooks, but there are some concerns that textbooks are inadequate to meet the educational objectives. In addition, college entrance exams which should be based on textbooks are different from what students learn on textbook. To be more specific, since English textbooks used in secondary schools are useless for KSAT which is more difficult than textbooks’ contents, students do not pay attention in English classes in school. This results in rising private educational spending. It’s hard to say all problems are started by current textbooks, but they are partially responsible for it.
The history of English education in Korea is not that long. Despite the brief history, interest that people have in English is second to none as you see in the long lines in front of famous private English institutes. In this seminar, the major problems of Korean English education were identified, and the students gave presentations on some major issues in English education. Korea’s current English education system has to be changed as you see in the three reasons; absolute shortage of English lessons, passive education system, and inadequacy of English textbooks and exams. There is an old-saying, “If you know your enemy and yourself, you can win every battle.” In this case, enemy is an old English education custom and the battle is a ceaseless endeavor for quality English teaching and learning through public English education.